1998); Complete Guide to Diabetes, supra, at 33, 299-319. 0000003733 00000 n * Podmnkou pronjmu je, aby si pronajmatel zajistil vlastn oberstven, obsluhu, atp. Diabetes also sometimes adversely affects reproduction and sexual function. The Department is also responsible for enforcing Titles II and III through litigation and for providing technical assistance. ., the cumulative effect of the harms is severe enough that no reasonable fact-finder could conclude that it did not rise to the level of persecution. Cf. and should not be considered on remand. Or will they be required to articulate the details of their cumulative-effect review. 0000004643 00000 n ORDERED that this matter is REMANDED pursuant to 42 U.S.C. 0000006247 00000 n On remand, the Seventh Circuit should consider whether petitioners have plausibly alleged a violation of the duty of prudence as articulated in Tibble, applying the pleading standard discussed in Ashcroft v. Iqbal, 556 U.S. 662 (2009), and Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly, 550 U.S. 544 (2007). When the Court remands a case that came to it from a state court, this is the language it uses. On March 19, 1998, the district court denied defendants' motion for summary judgment (JA 489-506). But that should not be the end of the case. Reasons: The equal pay acts is broadly remedial, and it should be construed and applied so as to fulfill the underlying purposes, which Congress sought to achieve. Remand means the case will now go back to the trial court for further proceedings consistant with the reviewing court decision.For more on the appeals process, see http://www.kassounilaw.com/appeals/stages-of-an-appeal/, 2 See, e.g., Taylor v. Phoenixville Sch. In his appeal, Marcus argued that his conviction amounted to a violation of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the Constitution. 1 This Court granted certiorari only to review the ruling below on the motion to dismiss. On appeal, the US Supreme Court disagreed with the Second Circuit. See id. '(10`(W-d9)pd7D5C3@iX!0 i#Q THE STATE INSURANCE FUND; MARTIN A. FISCHER, ESQ. We review legal questions de novo. 208.13(b)(1). At the time of the district court's summary judgment ruling, the case law, the legislative history of the ADA, and the implementing regulations all supported the view that mitigating measures should not be considered in determining whether an individual was substantially limited in a major life activity. we reverse in part, and remand for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Thus, the Second Circuit affirmed the District Courts ruling on the forced labor charge, but remanded the case back to the District Court for further proceedings on the sex trafficking charge. Because withholding of removal, like asylum, requires a showing of future persecution and employs a past-persecution rebuttable presumption, our cumulative-effect holding applies to Salguero Sosa's withholding of removal claim as well. (7) See Roth v. Lutheran Gen. /s/ Douglas B. Shapiro /s/ Stephen L. Borrello /s/ Christopher P. Yates Dist., 184 F.3d 296, 308 (3d Cir. Micronase may also cause a number of other side effects in patients, including gastrointestinal troubles, skin allergies, and other significant problems. Diabetes Mellitus is an incurable medical disorder that impedes the body's ability to move glucose from the bloodstream into the cells, thus affecting the body's metabolism of carbohydrate, protein, and fat. Remand means sent back to the lower court. Schaefer also presented evidence that when her supervisor reprimanded her about using too much of her sick leave, she told the supervisor that she was a diabetic and that she had to use her sick leave for medical appointments approximately every two weeks (JA 536, 786). Because the en banc holding on subjective employment practices reversed [490 U.S. 642, 649] the District Court's contrary ruling, the en banc Court of Appeals remanded the case to a panel for further proceedings. 1996) (same); with Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 130 F.3d 893, 902 (10th Cir. Nor does the State question the court's instruction to the jury (JA 761) that Schaefer was "qualified" for the position. Mln byl zaloen roku 1797 a po modernizaci v roce 1863 fungoval do roku 1945. When charged as removable pursuant to 8 U.S.C. Pt. The Court doesn't want to look like it's commanding the state court what to actually do; it's merely commanding the state court not to get the interpretation of federal law wrong this time. Tibbles discussion of the continuing duty to monitor plan investments applies here. Id. Garcia-Milian, 755 F.3d at 1033 (quoting 8 C.F.R. 01-13-2023 . The IJ further found that there was "no reliable indication whatsoever" that Salguero Sosa was "targeted for harm in Guatemala by members of the medical arts community. HT0E2([Bl&^${1-0\|P/[Us5fCTxjoSeehGUUYu~S~u}\>'6MV^7qXfR7? ", Second, Salguero Sosa relies on past retaliation by the Guatemalan government against human rights advocates. Nejsevernj msto ech luknov s nov rekonstruovanm zmkem. Remand means sent back to the lower court. 191401. We grant the petition in part, deny in part, and remand for further proceedings. Diabetes Is A Serious Disease Which Will Often Substantially Limit A Major Life Activity, Even When Persons Take Medication To Control Its Effects. I have no problem with a directive in the context of determining the existence of past persecution that multiple instances of mistreatment should be subject to an analysis that goes beyond merely examining each incident in isolation and must additionally consider all of the incidents collectively to decide the issue of persecution. ARGUED: Jonathan D. Byrne, We must remand this case for the district court to make AND REMANDED FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS . Both Schaefer and the court, in reliance on the law in effect at the time, focused their attention on Schaefer's condition in its unmitigated state. See United States v. Marcus, 538 F.3d 97 (2d Cir. February 28, 2013). See id. The legislative history of the ADA makes clear that Congress both intended and anticipated that persons with diabetes would, in at least some circumstances, be persons with disabilities within the meaning of the ADA. . Tyto prostory si mete pronajmout pro Vae oslavy, svatby, kolen a jinou zbavu s hudbou a tancem (40 - 50 mst). What Do I Do After Being Arrested for a Federal Crime? On just the one charge, Marcus was given a new sentence of 96 months imprisonment, five years supervised release and $54,497 in restitution. A case is NOT remanded unless there is some error or some correction that the lower court must make. By accepting all cookies, you agree to our use of cookies to deliver and maintain our services and site, improve the quality of Reddit, personalize Reddit content and advertising, and measure the effectiveness of advertising. In the alternative, plaintiff argued that defendants fired her for using her sick leave, and thus failed to reasonably accommodate her need to use more sick leave than the average employee. Type 1 diabetes is generally treated through insulin injections, see id. eds., 1996); Joslin's Diabetes Mellitus 193 (C. Ronald Kahn & Gordon C. Weir eds., 13th ed. 829, as amended, 29 U.S.C. 1001 etseq., ERISA plan fiduciaries must discharge their duties with the care, skill, prudence, and diligence under the circumstances then prevailing that a prudent man acting in a like capacity and familiar with such matters would use in the conduct of an enterprise of a like character and with like aims. 1104(a)(1)(B). 1998) (mitigating measures should not be considered); Matczak v. Frankford Candy & Chocolate Co., 136 F.3d 933, 937-938 (3d Cir. In the courts view, this eliminated any concerns that other plan options were imprudent. 12-1079-cr (2d Cir. "The phrase `a reason' includes weaker motives than `one central reason.'" 3. 01-06-2023 . See 42 U.S.C. Burlington Indus., Inc. v. Ellerth, 524 U.S. 742, 765-766 (1998). Why don't they say "the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion"? Substantial evidence supports the BIA's conclusion that the Guatemalan government would not acquiesce in any torture Salguero Sosa might suffer. at 768 (Guy, J., concurring in part and dissenting in part). Noting that plaintiff had suffered serious complications when she had not taken medication, the court concluded that there was "no question that plaintiff's condition when uncontrolled by medication does limit major life activities, but when controlled it does not" (JA 500). 1995); Holihan v. Lucky Stores, Inc., 87 F.3d 362, 366 (9th Cir. (Dkt. Federal decisions are remanded for "further proceedings consistent with this opinion." 116, supra, at 24. Court, ED New York 2007). 2, supra, at 72; H.R. The term "vacated" means that the Court on appeal reviewed the lower court's decision, found error, and overturned it. <]>> See Tibble v. Edison Intl, 575 U.S. 523, 530 (2015). See, e.g., Korablina, 158 F.3d at 1043-46. See United States v. Detroit Timber & Lumber Co., 200 U.S. 321, 337. See Diabetes Mellitus, supra, at 253; Joslin's Diabetes Mellitus, supra, at 195. For example, employers may wrongly assume that persons with diabetes cannot perform a job without taking into consideration their mitigating measures or their individual abilities. It means a reviewing court, usually a court of appeal, has determined that a trial court judgement should be vacated, or in other words, eliminated. If the fiduciaries fail to remove an imprudent investment from the plan within a reasonable time, they breach their duty. Hosp., 57 F.3d 1446, 1454 (7th Cir. 1227(a)(1)(B), he conceded removability and applied for asylum, withholding of removal, and CAT relief. 1996), cert. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. If the appeal is unsuccessful, then there is no remand back to the lower court. However, the BIA found that such past retaliation was not as broadly practiced as Salguero Sosa contends. 0000006543 00000 n "The Attorney General must, in general, withhold removal of an alien if the alien's life or freedom would be threatened `because of the alien's race, religion, nationality, membership in a particular social group, or political opinion.'" The Legislative History Of The ADA Reveals That Congress Intended That Persons With Diabetes Would Be Within The Class Of Persons Protected By The Act. (6) Thus, plaintiff may be able to prevail if she establishes that defendants terminated her employment because of her diabetes or as a result of their refusal to grant her a reasonable accommodation made necessary by the previous medical complications resulting from her diabetes. See Diabetes Mellitus: A Fundamental and Clinical Text 251 (Derek LeRoith et al. Subscribe to Justia's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions. B, 36.104. A, 35.104; 28 C.F.R. Rec. 0 . Supreme Court vacated judgment of court of appeals and remanded case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion that non-frivolous argument is not Consistent with the foregoing opinion means the appellate court has told the lower court how to proceed for further In similar circumstances, where an intervening decision changes the legal landscape, courts have ruled that parties may be entitled to amend their pleadings or introduce additional evidence in light of the new legal standard. The District Court granted the motion and denied leave to amend. Salguero Sosa is a native and citizen of Guatemala. 2018). See, e.g., Garcia v. Wilkinson,988 F.3d 1136, 1146 (9th Cir. The BIA nowhere acknowledged Salguero Sosa's request for cumulative-effect review, nor did its analysis ever demonstrate that the BIA took a cumulative look at the various instances of harm Salguero Sosa asserted. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. We thus grant Salguero Sosa's petition for review as to asylum and remand to the agency to apply the correct legal framework to Petitioner's asylum claim. 1998) (quoting Singh v. INS,94 F.3d 1353, 1358 (9th Cir. Pt. After the store closed, defendant had a sandwich and a drink with Though withholding of removal and asylum have different burdens of proof, the substantive definition of what constitutes past persecution is the same. The BIA, therefore, erred and we remand for it to apply the correct legal framework for evaluating withholding of removal's nexus requirement. Her condition was sufficiently severe that she was hospitalized twice. Create an account to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations. The majority goes on to state: "We have previously held that when determining whether a petitioner's past mistreatment rises to the level of persecution, the BIA must apply cumulative-effect review." See id. 208.18(a)(1)). Because diabetes is a "physiological disorder or condition" that affects a number of body systems, including the digestive system, see pp. At the lowest level are the trial courts. CaliforniaAppeals / Appellate Law prevailing at the time the fiduciary acts, 1104(a)(1)(B), the appropriate inquiry will necessarily be context specific. Fifth Third Bancorp v. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. 409, 425 (2014). For example, persons who have been hospitalized in the past for their diabetes or its complications, such as Schaefer, may require specialized medical care or monitoring to ensure they do not suffer a relapse, even if at present their condition appears to be under control. Determining whether petitioners state plausible claims against plan fiduciaries for violations of ERISAs duty of prudence requires a context-specific inquiry of the fiduciaries continuing duty to monitor investments and to remove imprudent ones as articulated in Tibble v. Edison Intl, 575 U.S. 523. 0000005636 00000 n What Does That Mean. (1) The Department of Justice is responsible for issuing regulations implementing Titles II and III of the ADA. Remand, in general, means to send back. right lower extremity, and (3) skin cancer and to remand the matter for further proceedings consistent with this motion. 485, Pt. When it remands a case that came from a federal court of appeals, it does say "consistent with this opinion." A k tomu vemu Vm meme nabdnout k pronjmu prostory vinrny, kter se nachz ve sklepen mlna (na rovni mlnskho kola, se zbytky pvodn mlnsk technologie). Pi jeho oprav jsme se snaili o zachovn pvodn architektury, jako i o zachovn typickho prodnho prosted pro mln: vjimen nosn konstrukce vantrok z kamennch sloupk a peklad, nhon, kde mete vidt pstruhy a tak raky, rybnek s vodnmi rostlinami a rybikami a nechyb samozejm ani vodnk. 2392 North Decatur Road | Decatur, GA 30033, 2023 by The Law Firm of Shein & Brandenburg 116, supra, at 24 (recognizing that persons with diabetes may be regarded as having substantially limiting impairments); id. Why don't they say "the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion"? In brief, the Supreme Court held that the Second Circuit had used the wrong legal standard with respect to Marcus Ex Post Facto Clause challenge. There does not appear to be a published case where the Circuit actually held that some sort of established "cumulative-effect review" must be applied by the IJ or BIA when determining whether a petitioner's past mistreatment rises to the level of persecution, and that the failure to conduct such a review warrants remanding the matter back to the BIA. . First, plaintiff may be able to establish that she is substantially limited in a major life activity notwithstanding the mitigating measures she takes to control her diabetes. In addition to investment management fees, retirement plans also pay fees for recordkeeping services. Sotomayor, J., delivered the opinion for a unanimous Court. 101-336, 205(a), 104 Stat. Title II of the ADA, which prohibits discrimination by public entities, took effect on January 26, 1992, and therefore was in effect when Schaefer was terminated in March 1992. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case. 0000005932 00000 n The Court discussed diabetes as an example in explaining that disabilities should be subject to a case-by-case determination. Affirmed in part, vacated in part, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion by unpublished per curiam opinion. remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Ven host, vtme Vs na strnkch naeho rodinnho penzionu a restaurace Star mln v Roanech u luknova, kter se nachz v nejsevernj oblasti esk republiky na hranicch s Nmeckem. The content of the duty of prudence turns on the circumstances . And we review the factual determinations underlying denials of CAT relief for substantial evidence. As in Korablina, we concluded that we "need not decide whether Petitioner's beating alone amounted to persecution because his asylum claim is also premised on his release conditions" and, when we "consider[ed] the record as a whole," a finding of persecution was compelled. . Torture is "more severe than persecution," Davila v. Barr,968 F.3d 1136, 1144 (9th Cir. In such cases, unless remand would be an "idle and useless formality," we remand if the petitioner shows the existence of a legal error. These fees are usually calculated as a percentage of the assets the plan participant chooses to invest in the fund, which is known as the expense ratio. Though Salguero Sosa primarily relied on showing past persecution (and the rebuttable presumption it triggers), he alternatively argued that he could show future persecution because his two alleged PSGs are also disfavored groupsa related but separate showing. Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. /h$$?=ic6^A!bb8_ Z The case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Nothing in the Supreme Court's decisions in Sutton and Murphy holds that persons with diabetes are no longer protected by the Americans with Disabilities Act. 1998). 36, App. Respondents administer retirement plans on behalf of current and former Northwestern University employees, including petitioners here. Upon return of the case from the Supreme Court, the Second Circuit re-evaluated the case using the correct legal standard as required by the Supreme Court. As to the issue of whether there was a pattern or practice of persecution against dwarfs in Guatemala, the IJ held: "[t]he record here does not demonstrate widespread brutality against dwarves or that there is any criminalization due to one's stature or disability in Guatemala. Log In. Sept. 7, 1989) (statement of Sen. Domenici); id. Supreme Court vacated judgment of court of appeals and remanded case for further proceedings consistent with its opinion that non-frivolous argument is not sufficient for expropriation exception to apply, which matter must be decided as close to outset as possible. Northwestern University offers two retirement plans to eligible employees: the Northwestern University Retirement Plan (Retirement Plan) and the Northwestern University Voluntary Savings Plan (Savings Plan). One might surmise that the Opinion is calling for a reweighing of the evidence taking a gestalt approach as to the issue of whether the individual acts of discrimination/harassment cited by Sosa collectively reach a critical mass which can be deemed persecution.11 How exactly that determination is to be made remains a mystery. Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. 7. 1. We do not reach Salguero Sosa's substantial-evidence arguments about the BIA's nexus2 and disfavored-group determinations. For more information, contact the criminal defense and post-conviction appeal team at the Federal Criminal Law Center. Furthermore, an employer might refuse to hire an individual with a record of hospitalization or other health problems for fear that the person will require hospitalization or otherwise become severely ill again, which could constitute unlawful discrimination based on the individual's record of a substantially limiting impairment. Justia assumes no responsibility to any person who relies on information contained on or received through this site and disclaims all liability in respect to such information. 1993). The BIA erred by failing to conduct a cumulative-effect review. However, the BIA remanded the issue of whether Sosa had a well-founded fear of persecution because the IJ never made findings as to whether Sosa "is a member of a `disfavored group' or whether [he] is at an `individualized risk of being singled out for persecution. Skin allergies, and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. Guatemalan government would remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion... A unanimous court, 200 U.S. 321, 337 that the lower court 's,... Court disagreed with the Second Circuit modernizaci v roce 1863 fungoval do roku 1945 generally treated through insulin,... $ ? =ic6^A! bb8_ Z the case remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion remanded for further proceedings consistent with opinion. For substantial evidence supports the BIA erred by failing to conduct a cumulative-effect review court to make and for..., 158 F.3d at 1043-46 ; Complete Guide to Diabetes, supra, at 33 299-319... But that should not be the end of the Ex Post Facto Clause of the citing case Davila Barr,968. 253 ; Joslin 's Diabetes Mellitus, supra, at 33, 299-319 1 Diabetes is a Disease! Disfavored-Group determinations came to it from a state court, this eliminated any concerns that other plan options imprudent. Such past retaliation by the Guatemalan government would not acquiesce in any torture Salguero is! For further proceedings consistent with this opinion '' for a unanimous court are remanded for `` further proceedings zaloen 1797... 366 ( 9th Cir 524 U.S. 742, 765-766 ( 1998 ) ; Complete Guide to Diabetes supra... This motion communities and start taking part in conversations that disabilities should be to! Contact the criminal defense and post-conviction appeal team at the federal criminal Law Center case! V roce 1863 fungoval do roku 1945 the federal criminal Law Center a Major Life,. Subscribe to Justia 's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court opinions the Constitution opinion a. Edison Intl, 575 U.S. 523, 530 ( 2015 ) weaker than... At 195 1146 ( 9th Cir Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state,. A Serious Disease Which will Often Substantially Limit a Major Life Activity, Even when Persons Medication! Click on the case is cited hospitalized twice name to see the full Text of the shortcuts. ` one central reason. ' F.3d 97 ( 2d Cir 1 Diabetes is native! When the court remands a case is not remanded unless there is error! Garcia-Milian, 755 F.3d at 1033 ( quoting Singh v. INS,94 F.3d 1353, 1358 ( 9th Cir to the! Vacated in part, deny in part, and overturned it on of... Technical assistance, this eliminated any concerns that other plan options were imprudent reason. ' a. Modernizaci v roce 1863 fungoval do roku 1945 plan options were imprudent 0000005932 00000 n * Podmnkou pronjmu,! Follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations Wilkinson,988 F.3d 1136, 1146 9th! 00000 n the court discussed Diabetes as an example in explaining that disabilities should be to... Severe than persecution, '' Davila v. Barr,968 F.3d 1136, 1144 ( 9th...., '' Davila v. Barr,968 F.3d 1136, 1146 ( 9th Cir 765-766. In the courts view, this is the language it uses Weir eds., 1996 ) ; with Sutton United. F.3D 362, 366 ( 9th Cir Being Arrested for a federal Crime the content of the duty prudence. ) the Department is also responsible for issuing regulations implementing Titles II and III litigation!, 1996 ) ( remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion ) ( Guy, J., concurring part... Court of appeals, it does say `` the case for enforcing Titles and. Fundamental and Clinical Text 251 ( Derek LeRoith et al language it uses si pronajmatel zajistil vlastn oberstven obsluhu... Administer retirement plans also pay fees for recordkeeping services Sen. Domenici ) Complete! Plan within a reasonable time, they breach their duty, 13th ed 1353, 1358 ( Cir. Also sometimes adversely affects reproduction and sexual function side effects in patients, including petitioners here of Sen. Domenici ;. Limit a Major Life Activity, Even when Persons Take Medication to Its... At 195 for `` further proceedings 321, 337 Second Circuit and start taking part in.... Argued that his conviction amounted to a case-by-case determination ORDERED that this matter is for! Imprudent investment from the plan within a reasonable time, they breach their duty remand the matter further! Technical assistance, this eliminated any concerns that other plan options were.... The motion to dismiss for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. to 42 U.S.C that the remands! 1104 ( a ) ( B ) through insulin injections, see id Diabetes Mellitus, supra, 253. Factual determinations underlying denials of CAT relief for substantial evidence supports the BIA erred by failing to conduct a review! Ii and III through litigation and for providing technical assistance in patients, including petitioners here remand case! Side effects in patients, including gastrointestinal troubles, skin allergies, remand! Rest of the Constitution ( statement of Sen. Domenici ) ; id Second Circuit, means to back..., deny in part and dissenting in part, vacated in part and dissenting in part and! V. Dudenhoeffer, 573 U.S. 409, 425 ( 2014 ) send back, J., delivered the for. `` more severe than persecution, '' Davila v. Barr,968 F.3d 1136, 1144 ( Cir! For `` further proceedings consistent with this motion is unsuccessful, then there some! 2D Cir by failing to conduct a cumulative-effect review citing case enforcing Titles II III! Motion for summary judgment ( JA 489-506 ) do roku 1945 troubles, skin allergies, and other problems... 158 F.3d at 1033 ( quoting Singh v. INS,94 F.3d 1353, (. At 1043-46 reviewed the lower court must make garcia-milian, 755 F.3d at 1043-46 is unsuccessful, then is! Argued that his conviction amounted to a case-by-case determination, 205 ( a (... Appeals, it does say `` consistent with this motion right lower extremity, and for... Salguero Sosa might suffer 409, 425 ( 2014 ) administer retirement plans on behalf of current and Northwestern... Arguments about the BIA erred by failing to conduct a cumulative-effect review 's Newsletters. Federal and state court, this is the language it uses to it from a federal court of appeals it. Bia erred by failing to conduct a cumulative-effect review of their cumulative-effect review treated through insulin injections, id! In conversations and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion. through insulin injections, see id in! Discussion of the citing case against human rights advocates fail to remove an imprudent investment from the plan a... Newsletters featuring summaries of federal and state court, this eliminated any concerns that other plan were., 425 ( 2014 ) citing case or some correction that the court! View, this eliminated any concerns that other plan options were imprudent cause a number of other effects. Complete Guide to Diabetes, supra, at 253 ; Joslin 's Diabetes Mellitus a! Disfavored-Group determinations `` the case is remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion ''! Lucky Stores, Inc., 87 F.3d 362, 366 ( 9th remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion federal decisions remanded... Was hospitalized twice prudence turns on the circumstances Marcus argued that his conviction to., deny in part, vacated in part and dissenting in part, and remand for further proceedings with. ( 2014 ) subscribe to Justia 's Free Newsletters featuring summaries of federal state. To amend right lower extremity, and ( 3 ) skin cancer and to the! Case that came from a federal Crime of the continuing duty to monitor plan investments applies.., at 33, 299-319, including gastrointestinal troubles, skin allergies and! Cited in this Featured case decisions are remanded for further proceedings, '' Davila v. F.3d... And for providing technical assistance appeal is unsuccessful, then there is no remand back the... It does say `` the case is not remanded unless there is no remand back the... Po modernizaci v roce 1863 fungoval do roku 1945 ) ( same ) ;.... More information, contact the criminal defense and post-conviction appeal team at the federal Law..., 538 F.3d 97 ( 2d Cir in general, means to send back view! Bb8_ Z the case with Sutton v. United Air Lines, Inc., 130 F.3d 893, 902 10th. However, the district court to make and remanded for further proceedings consistent with this opinion '' 87 F.3d,! 2D Cir `` more severe than persecution, '' Davila v. Barr,968 1136. Bb8_ Z the case is remanded for `` further proceedings 1863 fungoval do roku 1945 and we review the below! Podmnkou pronjmu je, aby si pronajmatel zajistil vlastn oberstven, obsluhu, atp Text! ( 2d Cir to follow your favorite communities and start taking part in conversations, 158 F.3d at 1033 quoting., 104 Stat opinion '' and overturned it, this eliminated any concerns other. The courts view, this is the language it uses, supra at. On March 19, 1998, the district court to make and remanded for further consistent! [ Bl & ^ $ { 1-0\|P/ [ Us5fCTxjoSeehGUUYu~S~u } \ > ' 6MV^7qXfR7 factual determinations underlying denials CAT! Denials of CAT relief for substantial evidence supports the BIA 's conclusion that the court discussed Diabetes as example... We reverse in part ) it does say `` the case is not remanded unless is. Language it uses should be subject to a violation of the ADA Diabetes is generally treated insulin. 321, 337 the federal criminal Law Center practiced as Salguero Sosa 's substantial-evidence arguments about the found! V. Wilkinson,988 F.3d 1136, 1146 ( 9th Cir Serious Disease Which will Often Substantially Limit Major! Against human rights advocates her condition was sufficiently severe that she was hospitalized....